![]() Tidal can do right by adding FLAC hi-res while keeping MQA as it is, letting the debate between which is the better format soldier on. Their library of MQA content has gotten massive and getting rid of the format altogether would take away a big selling factor for a lot of devices. MQA will still probably remain a part of Tidal in some fashion, even as the company that runs the format files for bankruptcy. It’s really up to the listener to make that decision, but with Dorogusker’s recent statements, and the news that the company in charge of MQA is going bankrupt, it doesn’t look good for its credibility. Everyone has different ears, but many have made direct comparisons between MQA and FLAC, and have mostly favored FLAC although there are some who can’t tell the difference. Other services that use hi-res FLAC give you a more universal sound quality, and MQA just can’t match it. MQA’s harshest critics will claim that the format is nothing but a ripoff and that the streaming quality is no better than lossy. However, these devices have gotten quite inexpensive recently, with the $59 iFi Go Link as an example. In order to get true MQA as advertised, you must have a proper decoder, which is just more money that you’ll need to spend. This is one of the issues some take with MQA. You might have seen the MQA logo printed on various devices like DACs, amps, and dongles. It is marketed as the purest translation of the original recording. The idea is that this format would be able to grant you unaltered audio straight from the artist to your ears. If you’ve never heard of MQA before, it’s a CODEC that stands for Master Quality Authenticated. The Issue With MQAĪ very easy way to rile up audiophiles is to talk about MQA. Let’s dive into why Tidal might be having a change of heart regarding MQA, and what that might mean for their current subscribers. ![]() ![]() This information came from Tidal CEO Jesse Dorogusker himself when he conducted a Reddit AMA earlier this week. Now it looks like Tidal might be moving past MQA, and adapting hi-res FLAC as their competitors use. Some have even gone further to call MQA a scam. A lot of audiophiles have questioned Tidal’s MQA format, claiming that it’s not actually lossless. While other popular music streaming services like Apple Music, Amazon Music, and Qobuz offer hi-res, Tidal’s answer has been MQA for sample rates and bit depths beyond Redbook CD. Their service can give you CD-quality lossless audio with no problem, but its masters are a different story. Tidal’s MQA has garnered its fair share of controversy since its introduction. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |